Home :: Mission
:: Manifesto :: By-Laws :: Locals
:: Contact
Alliance for Freedom and Direct Democracy
Manifesto
In our lifetimes we have witnessed a world suffering at the hands of two major
global powers. Both the Eastern Communist Bloc and the Western Capitalist
Empire have perpetuated war, colonized nations, suppressed freedoms, despoiled
the natural world and imposed brutal regimes on the impoverished many in
order to further enrich a wealthy and powerful few. Since the fall of the
Communist Bloc, a neoliberal elite has proclaimed the "end of history":
a dystopic vision of a global capitalist consensus with no possible alternative.
Yet as long as domination and exploitation exist, there is still history
to be made. Oppression continues to rampage the entire globe through an interlocking
system of hierarchies that awaits transcendence. At the center of this system
are global finance institutions, wealthy western governments, the military
forces they wield, and the corporate constituents they represent. The proponents
of global capitalism claim that this system is a beacon of hope to the world— hope
for prosperity, democracy, and freedom.
Yet, where is the prosperity for the billions of working people locked into
meaningless jobs with meager wages, high rents, and poor public services? Where
is the democracy when a tiny elite of corporate selected politicians and business
people decide the fates of our communities behind closed doors? Where is the
freedom in a society that allows indigenous cultures to be annihilated, women
to be treated as sex objects and second-class citizens, people of color to
suffer police brutality, mass imprisonment and deportation, and queers to be
criminalized and attacked for daring to live and love outside of society's
strict gender roles and sexual restrictions?
Global capitalism is the newest phase of the age-old system of colonialism – a
system founded on the slaughter of indigenous nations, on the economic bounty
produced by slavery; on the relentless toil of immigrants, women, and industrial
workers, and on the exploitation of new lands and peoples. Underlying and justifying
this brutality are the ideologies of capitalism, white supremacy, patriarchy,
and imperialism, as well as that of a centralized state to enforce and maintain
them all.
Freedom and Non-Hierarchy
What basic principle holds all of these ideologies together? We contend that
this principle is hierarchy: the concept of top-down control, whereby one group
of people dominates and exploits another. Hierarchies stifle self-determination
and democratic control by usurping power from the many and placing it in the
hands of the few. They encourage a culture of obedience, apathy, and ignorance,
while suppressing our development as creative agents of our own destinies.
Hierarchies are reproduced and enforced by the powerful through the control
of political, social and economic institutions, through the manipulation of
culture and ideology and, ultimately, through the application of force.
Because we seek the realization of full and substantive freedoms for everyone
in our society, we emphasize the need to struggle for both negative and positive
freedom. This means freedom from material want, oppression and exploitation,
as well as freedom to define our own identities and to collectively determine
the destiny of our communities. Only when we are both liberated from the grasp
of tyranny and empowered by egalitarian relationships and institutions, may
we fulfill our full potential as free participants in a creative and dynamic
society.
The new world we envision and struggle towards will be directly democratic,
anarchist in its commitment to individual and social freedom, communal in the
ethic by which it produces and distributes goods, ecological in its relation
to the rest of the natural world, and utopian in its commitment to the permanent
process of creating a better world for all.
In addition to non-hierarchy and freedom, we strive to embody the following
principles in our confederation and to cultivate them in the greater society.
Confederalism and Direct Democracy
A state is a professional, bureaucratic apparatus for social control. States
exist not to protect citizens from one another, but rather to protect the
powerful from the aspirations of the powerless. They seek not to administer
society for the general good, but for the good of ruling elites. States
maintain monopolies of force internally by means of the police, and externally
by the use of military power, often abusing the language of "peacekeeping" and "humanitarianism" to
disguise militaristic intentions. Militarism is a political, economic and
cultural instrument that serves to concentrate state power and support neoliberal
expansion, while elevating the most aggressive and antisocial tendencies
in society.
While many states are structured as representative democracies, participation
is generally limited to election time, and frequently offers only the choice
between like-minded parties and corporate-sponsored politicians. Political
life in the US is so degraded that less than 50% of citizens even participate
in presidential elections. At the global decision-making level, there isn't
even the pretense of representative democracy. Institutions like the World
Trade Organization and International Monetary Fund make decisions of global
consequence behind closed doors.
With this in mind, we support the creation of liberatory institutions that
decentralize and equalize decision-making power. Direct democracy is a form
of organization in which all people have the right to deliberate over and
make decisions about matters that affect their lives, free from the intervention
of politicians or bosses. We work toward the implementation of direct democracy
in both the social sphere (schools, workplaces, social movements, etc.) and
political sphere (neighborhood assemblies, confederal councils, autonomous
municipalities, etc.). This political sphere is crucial, in that popular
self-government allows everyone to voluntarily interact at the face-to-face
level in order to determine public policy in an open and transparent way.
These directly democratic bodies should be based on community charters that
express the shared values and commitments of the members of each community.
Such charters must be shaped in a qualitatively participatory manner, and
include a commitment to a baseline of freedom. Such freedom is both the freedom
to actualize one’s potential and the freedom from domination and oppression
by others. To carry out the complex tasks of modern society, build relationships
of solidarity and cooperation, and avoid parochialism, directly democratic
bodies and social institutions need to be confederated across geographic
boundaries. Confederations should be based on shared interests and an agreed
upon set of principles, as expressed in a confederal charter. We envision
such decentralized confederations on the regional, continental, and even
global levels. Members of the confederation would democratically empower
delegates to confederal bodies on a rotational and recallable basis to facilitate
the creation of confederation-wide proposals, which would then return to
each self-governing community for deliberation and decision-making. The
structure of AFADD attempts to model and embody these principles.
While we believe that a stateless society based on the principles of direct
democracy and confederalism best embody our ideals of freedom, egalitarianism
and self-determination, we do not seek to impose a political system upon
anyone. We realize that freedom comes in many forms and that such forms must
be voluntarily chosen and culturally appropriate. For example, we support
the freedom struggles of the indigenous nations of this continent and hope
to work together to abolish the systems of oppression that affect us all.
We realize that the imposition of any foreign political system on indigenous
peoples only perpetuates the colonial tradition.
Throughout the ages, there have been many societies with directly democratic
political spheres. These include many Native American nations including the
Iroquois; Ancient Athens; countless African societies from the Tiv in Nigeria
to the Merina in Madagascar; the Paris Commune of 1871; New England town
meetings; the Iberian Anarchist Federation of Spain in the 1930s; and today’s
autonomous communities of the Zapatistas in Southern Mexico. In many of these
societies, however, particular groups have been barred from citizenship due
to slavery, patriarchy, racism, ageism and xenophobia. Hence direct democracy
must always be accompanied by a commitment to rooting out all forms of hierarchy
and domination.
Communal Economics
Commodities are the basic units of a capitalist society and are manufactured
for exchange or sale rather than for use; that is, they are produced to generate
profit, not to fulfill a social purpose. This profit goes into the pockets
of the capitalist class, which sets the terms and conditions under which
we work, the technologies we apply, and the economic development of our communities.
For the majority of people who do not belong to the capitalist class, capitalism
forces us to sell our labor in order to survive, turning our own bodies into
commodities. As the things we make and do at our jobs are taken from
us and turned into capital, we are alienated from the products of our own
labor; as our bodies are commodified, we are alienated from ourselves.
It is the continuous accumulation of capital and expansion into previously
unexploited arenas— such as the patenting of our genes and the privatization
of water— that is the driving dynamic of capitalism. This competitive
and cancerous logic seeks to commodify the whole of society, ultimately bleeding
people and the planet dry with its grow-or-die imperative.
Capitalism, then, isn't merely an economic mechanism; it is a full-fledged
set of social relations that warp human interests around the prerogatives
of possession and material advantage. Many citizens of the US no longer
identify as political beings, having succumbed so completely to our reassignment
as “consumers.” It is a system controlling not just production,
distribution, and consumption; it is a system that generates social control
itself. Capitalism hides the very social relations it perpetuates,
creating a commercial culture that distorts both our public and private lives
toward the norms of consumption and other manifestations of capital. Culture,
social relations, individual identity and, ultimately, biological life itself,
are reduced to commodities to be bought, sold and traded in the global capitalist
marketplace.
We believe that the production and distribution of goods should be directed
toward meeting human needs and desires rather than profits or private interests.
Moreover, we maintain that the social relations produced and masked by capitalism
can never be overcome without the abolition of capitalism, private property
(as distinguished from personal possessions), and wages. Rather than a constant
struggle of individual gains and losses, where "buyers" and "sellers" battle
it out in the marketplace, economic life should be transformed by an ethics
of mutuality and complementarity that reflects the interconnectedness of
social life, and of human society with the natural world. Economics should
be re-embedded in culture; that is, the economy should not be viewed as a
separate arena of power outside of human control. Since economic decisions
affect more than just the producers and consumers of specific goods, these
decisions should be made by all the people of a community, by fully politicizing
and democratizing the economy. This way, economic issues may be understood
holistically, and policy may be guided by a commitment to the greatest social
good.
A liberatory economic system must be built and maintained voluntarily, from
the bottom up. For instance, directly democratic workers' associations, acting
alongside and accountable to self-governing community assemblies, could carry
out production and distribution. Work could be transformed from mere drudgery
into a joyful expression of one's passions as well as a rich part of community
life itself. As a guiding principle for a communal economics, we adhere to
the maxim "from each according to one's ability and passions, to each
according to one's needs and desires, based on what's available to all." That
is, everyone contributes what they can toward the benefit of society, and
conversely, everyone receives what they need from that society, taking into
account material conditions.
Direct democracy and communal economics, however, are not ends in and of
themselves. To be desirable at all, these aims must be accompanied by an
equal commitment to the creation of an ethical society that is free from
all forms of hierarchy and oppression. In the absence of such a commitment,
direct democracy or communal economics might simply offer new forms of domination.
Therefore, the struggle for fundamental political and economic transformation
requires a transformation of social behavior, attitudes and ideologies. We
commit ourselves to the educational process of consciousness-raising necessary
to achieve such a transformation.
Social Freedom
We understand various forms of social oppression as particular manifestations
of the general logic of hierarchy. For example, we regard patriarchy as hierarchy
manifested in the realm of gender relations, and white supremacy as hierarchy
expressed in the arena of "racial" differentiation.
The principle of social freedom affirms our need to be free from externally
imposed constraints, and our ability to choose how we achieve our full individual
and collective potential. Each of us has a different set of often over-lapping
forms of oppression and privilege. Therefore, we challenge ourselves to confront
our own privileged behavior while speaking out against our own oppression,
as well as the oppression of others.
This vision of social freedom stands in marked contrast to our present society,
defined by lack of choice, immense stratification, imposed identities, and
a general lack of power over fundamental aspects of our lives. We desire
a world that is free from all essentialist categories that assign immutable
characteristics to particular groups, or that equate a specific culture with
a specific type of human being. Liberated by the principle of social freedom,
our lives may be self-defined, consciously chosen, and infinitely creative.
In this current historical moment, there are many forms of unfreedom that
warrant particular attention. We choose to focus here specifically on white
supremacy and racism; patriarchy, gender unfreedom, and heterosexism; and
classism, not because they are more important or more pervasive than other
systems of oppression, but because we believe that many revolutionary movements
have failed to challenge these systems. We aim to counter this trend, and
acknowledge that the struggle against all systems of oppression must include
at its foundation the struggle for racial, gender, sexual and cultural freedom.
White Supremacy and Racism
We live in a white supremacist society. By white supremacist we mean
an institutionally and ideologically perpetuated system of oppression that
values and privileges people racialized as “white” while degrading
and exploiting people racialized as “of color.” Race is neither
a genetically nor biologically “real” category, but a social
and political process of racialization: a process through which individuals
and groups come to be marked as “white” or “of color” and
come to be privileged or oppressed accordingly. It is for this reason that
we prefer to speak of people as being “racialized as white” and
or “racialized as of color,” rather than “white” and “of
color”. Such terms help us to point to race as an active process, rather
than a biological identity or reality. Asserting the idea of race as a process
does not imply that race is not ‘real’. Indeed, the idea of race
has very real social consequences in the world. Our intention is to point
to the myth of race as biological in the genetic or primordial sense— the
idea that race represents a static and pre-determined set of biological factors.
White supremacy served as the justification for Europe’s brutal colonization
of the planet, by which European invaders massacred and enslaved most of
the world’s people for their own power and enrichment. Throughout
the colonial process, religious ideologies and pseudo-scientific theories
of human genetics have been used in service to this project.
In the US, the massacre and theft of land of the indigenous people, the
enslavement of Africans, and waves of immigrant workers, especially from
the global South are central foundations of the US economy and society. Today
white supremacy serves as the justification for the colonization of nations
such as Puerto Rico, while creating new forms of colonization and imperialism
where transnational corporations exploit the nations of the global South
and communities “of color” in the global North.
White supremacy attempts to deny people racialized as “of color” a
sense of their own history through an educational system that only values “white” history
and achievements. White supremacy encourages the vilification of people “of
color” in the media and popular culture, leading people racialized
as “white” to believe that they are losing their jobs and neighborhoods
to “criminals” and “aliens.” People “of
color” are almost always the first and worst hit by economic downturns.
They tend to be locked into the least desirable and most dangerous and poorly
paid jobs. People racialized as “of color” are subject to a double
standard in the criminal injustice system that punishes them far more harshly
than people racialized as “white” for similar crimes, leading
to the disproportionate number of people “of color” in prison.
On the flip side, all classes of “whites” are offered material,
social and psychological incentives to align themselves with the “white” ruling
class.
Historically, predominantly “white” social movements have ignored
the demands of movements “of color” in order to secure short-term
gains for themselves while sacrificing the long-term goals for everyone’s
collective liberation. Examples of this are, the labor movement excluding
workers “of color”, the early women’s rights movements
uniting “white” women while ignoring the voices of women racialized
as of color, and environmental movements ignoring struggles against environmental
racism. This tradition is carried on in our movements today through the silencing
of people racialized as of color, the normalization of “white” culture,
the deprioritization of issues of importance to people racialized of color,
and the domination of positions of influence by people racialized as white.
People racialized as of color in the US have a strong tradition of powerful
resistance movements because their survival has depended on it. By challenging
fundamental issues of power and the white supremacist foundation of the US
these movements have constantly inspired and informed broader revolutionary
social struggles. In the contemporary era, for example, the Civil Rights
movement opened up the radical space necessary for the flourishing of the
student, anti-war, women’s liberation and queer liberation movements.
Our critical solidarity with struggles against white supremacy is vital.
Without the revolutionary overthrow of the white supremacist foundation of
US society, and the uprooting of white supremacist dynamics within our social
struggles, we will never realize the free society we envision and struggle
towards.
Classism
Class exploitation leads also to class-based discrimination, which privileges
middle and upper class culture and degrades working class culture. In order
to justify their subservience, working class communities are characterized
as stupid, unsophisticated, and incompetent. The history of the working classes
is omitted from the textbooks of our public school system. Folk culture and
working class culture are ignored, dismissed, or exoticized by middle and
upper class society. The voices and interests of working class and poor people
are excluded from most public forums. Class discrimination plays out in our
movements in a variety of ways including the normalization of middle class
culture, the use of economically inaccessible forms of organizing, the de-prioritization
of issues of importance to working class and poor people, the use of needlessly
academic language, and the silencing of the voices of working class and poor
people in our organizations.
Patriarchy, the Gender Binary, and Heterosexism
Sex, gender, and sexual-based oppressions are institutionally and ideologically
based systems of domination that affect the lives of women, transgendered
people, intersexed people, and queers. These oppressions rest on the foundation
of binary systems of categorization, legitimizing and reinforcing systems
of patriarchy, gender-based oppression and heterosexism.
Patriarchy is the institutional domination of women by men. In particular,
it entails the systematic privileging of the male sex, masculine gender expression,
and those perceived as men over the female sex, feminine gender expression,
and those perceived as women. Patriarchy expresses itself by force, direct
pressure, or though ritual, tradition, law, language, education and the division
of labor. All women are exposed to degrees of the ongoing and everyday stresses
of sexual objectification, male violence, and exploitation. These conditions
are intensified and particularized by women's material, social, and cultural
circumstances such as poverty, racism, and heterosexism.
The gender binary system is an institutionalized ideology that recognizes
only two natural and legitimate genders: masculine and feminine, as they
correspond to male and female sex categories. For the sex and gender
binary systems to retain legitimacy, there must be a strict policing of the
categories of male/female and masculine/feminine. This results in violence
toward all those whose bodies and gender expressions transgress the sex and
gender binary systems, most commonly intersexed and transgendered people.
Frequently, the genitals of intersexed children are mutilated at birth in
order to force their bodies into conformity with a singular, easily identifiable
sex. Acts of violence against trans and intersexed people seek to erase their
existence both figuratively and literally, from denial of self-definition,
employment, housing, marriage and family, to daily physical and psychological
violence. People who seem to conform to the confines of the gender binary
system are rewarded with relative acceptance, safety, and social privilege,
with the constant reminder that transgression will be punished. The human
potential of all people is severely limited by this coercive process.
Heterosexism is a system of oppression that values and privileges heterosexual
relationships, while marginalizing and even criminalizing same-sex relationships.
People whose behaviors, desires and relationships fall outside of these heterosexual
rules are considered criminal, unnatural, and immoral. There exists a continuum
of violence against gays, lesbians, bisexuals, and queers in which they are
subject not only to daily threats of physical and psychological violence,
but also to the denial of civil rights such as housing and employment, as
well as familial and social ostracizing. Violence against queers also manifests
through internalized homophobia and self-loathing leading to substance abuse,
eating disorders, and epidemically high suicide rates.
All people are subject to punishment when they challenge patriarchy, the
gender binary, or heterosexism. This punishment limits all of our capacities
for expression, creativity, dignity, and self-determination. Dynamics
of patriarchy, the gender binary, and heterosexism play out within our movements
and communities in many ways, including the devaluation of the voices and
issues of women, transgendered peoples and queers. We support the feminist
movement, the transgendered and intersexed liberation movement, and the gay,
lesbian, and bisexual liberation movements — in short, all movements
that seek to create a society in which all are free to determine their own
sex, gender, and sexuality along passionate and creative lines.
Ecological Sensibility
Domination in general and capitalism in particular threaten not only human
health and happiness but also the rest of the natural world. Ecological crises
are social crises in that they stem from the hierarchical, unaccountable
character of political and economic institutions at present. As the destiny
of humanity is tied inextricably to that of the natural world— of which
we are a part—ecological disasters inevitably become social ones. Because
of racist and classist environmental policies, poor communities and communities
of color are often the first and worst hit by ecological crises, and often
have little access to emergency services.
We nevertheless reject eco-philosophies that blame ‘technology’, ‘population’,
or ‘civilization’ as the root cause of ecological problems. Such
philosophies misdiagnose mere symptoms as the total disease, and can lead
to anti-humanist and racist conclusions. Reformist strategies that seek to
build a "greener capitalism" are also unacceptable— as they
fail to acknowledge that capitalism is driven to exploit the earth in new
and ever-more pervasive ways due to its growth imperative. Finally, we reject
the notion that humans, due to our expanded ability to reflect on and thus
change the natural environment, should stand above and dominate it.
This very capacity to imagine another world and reflect back on our actions
should place a unique responsibility on our shoulders: to seek a complementary
relationship with the natural world, and to develop and promote an ecological
sensibility. In fact, our unrivaled capacity for negative ecological impact
makes the actualization of our positive potential — a conscious ecological
sensibility — a necessity. We view human consciousness as emergent
from, and inherently embedded in the natural world. At the same time we recognize
that, to a greater degree than any other animal, we can theorize about our
environment, make ethical decisions, and imagine a better world. Thus we
believe that the non-dominating relationships we strive to create between
human beings must be extended to our relationship with the earth.
A conscious understanding of ecological integrity, and the long-term dynamic
stability of ecosystems needs to inform all decisions about our food systems,
land and energy use, production, consumption, and all other spheres of social
activity. We advocate for the development of appropriate technologies that
can sustain both people and the planet, and believe that egalitarian, humanly
scaled, and popularly controlled institutions are most compatible with this
aim. Technology both influences and reflects the values of social institutions
and relationships, and should be advanced along distinctly ethical, humanitarian
and ecological lines, in a manner that is fully subject to public debate
and decision making.
In a free society, labor-saving technologies can open up time for leisure,
creative pursuits and people's democratic involvement in the self-management
of their workplaces and communities. To attune technology with the ecological
integrity of both the human and non-human realms of the biosphere, we need
to institutionalize an ecological consciousness in the very fabric of direct
democracy.
Consistency of Means and Ends
The history of revolutionary movements has been tarnished by those who use
authoritarian means in the struggle for liberation. We believe that in order
to achieve our goal of a free society, we must organize in a manner that
prefigures such a world. We must act as ethically as possible to dismantle
this unethical world, and always strive to use anti-authoritarian methods
to replace authoritarian institutions. For many, it has been incredibly empowering
to participate in directly democratic forms of organizing against the patently
anti-democratic global institutions such as the WTO, IMF and World Bank.
Therefore, we are committed to our principles in practice as well as theory.
Internally, the organizational structure of AFADD attempts to reflect our
ideals of non-hierarchy, direct democracy, communal economics, libertarian
ethics, and an ecological sensibility to the greatest extent possible in
today's hierarchical society. Therefore, we seek to prioritize the voices
of oppressed peoples within our own confederation and to work in solidarity
with oppressed peoples struggling for justice and freedom. Likewise, we respect
and support the right of all marginalized peoples to organize autonomously
for their freedom.
Revolutionary Strategy
To achieve our vision of a free society, we must strive to dismantle all hierarchical
institutions and systems of oppression, put power into the hands of the people,
construct a moral economy, and reestablish a mutual relationship with the natural
world. Such a complete transformation of the power and priorities held in our
society would constitute a social revolution.
The revolution we work toward is not the violent takeover of society by some
centralized party apparatus or military force. Rather, it is a process of education
and action through which people come to recognize the need for social transformation,
realize their own collective and individual power, and voluntarily embrace
the need for revolutionary political change. It is, moreover, the active confrontation
with authoritarian power and oppression by directly democratic movements aimed
at institutionalizing liberatory forms of social freedom and popular self-government.
We do not wish to impose a "revolution" on anyone from the top down
but rather help to build a revolutionary movement of the majority that seeks
to democratically remake society from the bottom up.
Beyond Rejection, Beyond Reform
Many of us have been deeply inspired by and involved in the movement against
global capitalism. Yet within this movement we have witnessed the same ideological
battle playing itself out over and over again: Are we fighting to reform
the state and capitalism, or simply to reject them? We believe that both
of these strategies are deficient. While one attempts the impossible – to
reform the state and capitalism into benevolent institutions – the
other rejects the state and capitalism outright but cannot clearly articulate
an alternative.
Reformist strategies often succeed in providing for people's needs in the
here and now. However they fail to address the root causes of social oppression
and injustice and do little to dismantle the systems of power that perpetuate
them. Though they may affect the outcome of a decision, they do nothing
to challenge who is empowered to make that decision, nor by what process
the decision is arrived at. Thus if a reformist group does succeed in “winning” a
campaign, the win has little security. One need only look at the fates of
the Endangered Species Act, Welfare, or Social Security to see that reformist
legislation is often as fleeting as the moral integrity of the professional
politicians that usher it in. Therefore, while reformist strategies may achieve
victories, they are not equipped to lay the groundwork for a new and free
society.
On the flip side are the many protest movements and alternative social institutions
that aim simply to reject hierarchical systems of power. While essential,
we find that they too are often insufficient. Through protest movements we
are able to raise consciousness, foster coalitions and a sense of global
solidarity, practice directly democratic decision-making, reveal the violence
of the state, and release our anger and express our hope. In so doing, we
may tangibly obstruct the functioning of oppressive institutions. Yet, alone,
protest movements do little to lay the structural foundation necessary to
actualize a revolutionary shift in power. What do we do once the walls
have been torn down?
Similarly, those of us who focus on building alternative social institutions
often do invaluable work. We create alternative currency programs, free schools,
tool shares, and community gardens. Such institutions are invaluable in that
they teach us how to take democratic control over our lives, meet some of
our needs while drawing power and resources away from our oppressors, and
many have the potential to provide the nucleus from which a revolutionary
movement could emerge. Yet, unless we are clear in our intentions to confront,
dismantle, and replace the hierarchical systems of power that we reject,
our institution building efforts will languish as mere marginalized alternatives
with little revolutionary potential.
To truly bring about revolutionary change, we must turn our sights away
from reforming, and far beyond simply rejecting hierarchical systems of power.
In all of our projects, we seek to maintain an active opposition to all systems
of oppression, prefigure the world we hope to create, and meet peoples’ needs
in the here in now. We must help build a revolutionary movement to confront,
dismantle, and ultimately replace hierarchical systems of power with a society
of empowered participants, free to pursue their needs and desires within
a network of popularly controlled institutions and a culture of liberation.
This is the strategic basis of dual power.
Building Dual Power
The strategic approach that we believe has the greatest potential to actualize
our revolutionary vision is dual power. A dual power strategy focuses simultaneously
on both opposition and reconstruction, seeking to combine these forces into
a counter power that erodes and ultimately replaces the dominant power structure.
Though dual power may emerge from a protest movement or an alternative social
institution, its scope of vision transcends the revolutionary potential of
both. The counter institutions created through a dual power strategy would
be popularly empowered and radically egalitarian. To eventually replace hierarchical
systems of power, such counter-institutions must begin building the structural
foundation now for the society we work toward for the future. Dual power
seeks to erode the legitimacy of the state and other systems of centralized
power by developing popular power at the grassroots level in communities,
workplaces, schools, and wherever else we see the potential to do so. While
working to meet people's material needs and satisfy their desires for freedom,
these counter-institutions consistently create dissonance with the top-down
institutions they seek to dismantle. They challenge and encroach on the hegemony
of the hierarchical systems of power they seek to replace, and transform
support for centralized forms of power into a widespread demand for popular
self-government.
To effectively challenge a hierarchical system of power, the counter institution
strives to broaden the scope of its legitimacy to the most general extent
possible. The ultimate aim is to establish a dual power that offers all community
members the opportunity to participate directly in making democratic decisions
on all matters of community concern, for the benefit of the community as
a whole. As a confederation, we are committed to the reconstruction of the
civil sphere. Within this arena it is the neighborhood assembly that we feel
embodies the most general possible scope of legitimacy, in that it does not
require that its participants be workers, parents, or students, but only
that they be residents.
Direct Action
We define direct action as taking immediate action toward meeting revolutionary
goals, without asking a higher authority for permission. Direct action can
take many forms, from the reclamation of public space through street blockades,
guerilla gardening, and pirate radio, to the creation of extra legal neighborhood
and workplace assemblies. A direct action approach frees us from having to
limit our vision of what is possible to what is presently sanctioned, and
allows us to define our struggle on our own terms. We prioritize forms of
direct action that are 1) directly democratic in their design, 2) fully accountable
to the oppressed communities most affected by our actions, and 3) embedded
within a broader dual power strategy.
While most conceptions of direct action are limited to confrontational and
militant tactics, we view direct action as being much more than a mere tactic.
We regard direct democracy itself as a form of direct action. The popular
participation and empowerment that we seek to institutionalize in decision-making
is presently so lacking in current systems of power that challenging these
systems using directly democratic means is truly a form of direct action. Direct
democracy institutionalizes direct action as a proactive process of taking
direct control over our lives and the future of our communities.
Illustrative Opposition
Building a dual power is no simple task. What we can do quite easily, however,
is to begin where our community is at. We can look for the particular struggles
against oppression that are of great concern to our community, (the WTO,
gentrification, or the lack of access to health care) and use these particular
issues to illustrate our wider revolutionary analysis and vision. We call
this approach illustrative opposition.
Illustrative opposition is a process of drawing out the broader revolutionary
potential that lies nascent within the struggle against any particular form
of hierarchy or oppression. It allows us to frame any particular struggle
such that it is presented as a logical first step in a much greater struggle;
logical because the particular issue being addressed is shown to be but one
manifestation of a much more insidious system of hierarchical oppression.
Through illustrative opposition we can begin to knit together a broad coalition
of resistance movements, united in both analysis and vision.
Prefigurative Politics
To achieve our vision, we believe that we must organize now in a manner
that is consistent with our principles and that prefigures the world we wish
to create. Organizing prefiguratively provides us with an arena for experimenting
with new liberatory forms of decision-making and social interaction, while
it offers us a glimpse of the society we hope to create. Therefore, in all
of our work we seek to create functioning models that demonstrate both the
feasibility and desirability of our reconstructive vision.
Revolutionary Organization
The vehicle that we believe offers us the greatest foundation from which
to begin to actualize our vision is our revolutionary organization. AFADD
is premised upon a shared revolutionary analysis, vision and strategy. It
may provide us with a framework to further develop our ideas, share resources,
and unify our action in our struggle for a free society. We do not claim
to be "the movement," but rather one tendency within it; nor do
we aspire to become the dual power, rather we participate in the creation
of counter institutions that could.
We are a membership-based organization, as opposed to collective or affinity
group models of organization. We choose to organize around political affinity,
rather than personality or lifestyle affinity, in order to remain politically
coherent while keeping the organization as open as possible. Our confederal
organizational structure allows us to act with a high degree of unity and
coordination, without sacrificing the benefits of directly democratic decision-making
and local autonomy.
Education for Revolutionary Transformation
Every revolutionary project must have, at its foundation, an educational
component. Therefore, primary to our work as revolutionaries is our commitment
to an on-going study of our world as well as the movements that have historically
attempted to transform it. We develop our understanding through study groups,
discussion forums, workshops, conferences, and through direct engagement
in diverse social movements. We support educational projects that explore
the detrimental effects of white supremacy, patriarchy, classism, and heterosexism
on movements for social change. In addition, we seek to develop different
approaches to uprooting these forms of oppression. While we value having
a coherent theory as a guide for our action, we view it as a living entity
in constant engagement with the world in which we live and struggle. Just
as our theory influences our actions, our actions influence our theory— and
we expect them both to evolve over time.
In addition to furthering our own theoretical development, we are committed
to creating educational forums for people outside our organization. This
can take a variety of forms, from teach-ins, public debates, and publications,
to direct actions. We offer these forums out of a desire to engage in mutual
dialogue with others about the state of the world and how we might transform
it. We don't endeavor to lead people to the "correct" conclusions,
but rather to create liberating forums where we can all realize our own collective
and individual power. We seek to create a society of free, independently
minded participants, not of uncritical followers of a new ideology.
Solidarity Work
In order to confront obstacles that have traditionally divided and weakened
movements for social justice and freedom, and to demonstrate active solidarity
with oppressed peoples, we enter into coalitions to launch collaborative
campaigns of mutual interest. When we engage in collaborative campaigns we
neither discard our politics nor push for a particular line. Instead, we
attempt to integrate our unique political approach with the objectives of
a coalition, creating a dynamic interplay that is honest, non-manipulative,
and mutually enriching. When working in coalition with groups whose voices
have been marginalized throughout history, such as people of color, women,
queer folks, and working class people, we try to make space for those voices
to be heard, as we do in our own organization. We believe that our own freedom
is linked inextricably to the freedom of all. Therefore, we must actively
combat the specific forms of oppression, such as white supremacy, patriarchy
and heterosexism that inhibit the freedom of all. This means standing in
solidarity with those groups and organizations that are already challenging
such systems of oppression.
Join Us!
There are many other political approaches and revolutionary organizations,
and we encourage you to explore them all. However, if you find that the collection
of ideas expressed in this document resonates well with your own, we invite
you to join us in our struggle for a free and democratic society.
|